<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Colorado Progressive &#187; Mark Udall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coloradoprogressive.com/tag/mark-udall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coloradoprogressive.com</link>
	<description>Colorado &#38; The Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:13:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pissy GOP Cuts Senate Business Hours</title>
		<link>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/03/24/pissy-gop-cuts-senate-business-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/03/24/pissy-gop-cuts-senate-business-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Plavnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire McCaskill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pine Beetles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Obstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoprogressive.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: CNN reports that Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was also blocked from working, unable in this case to conduct a hearing with a U.S. military commander flown in from Korea.
__________
It&#8217;s no secret that Republicans are unhappy with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. But cutting the U.S. Senate&#8217;s hours of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: CNN <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/24/health.care.main/?hpt=T1">reports</a> that Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was also blocked from working, unable in this case to conduct a hearing with a U.S. military commander flown in from Korea.</p>
<p>__________</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that Republicans are unhappy with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. But <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/03/24/senate-gop-hearings/">cutting the U.S. Senate&#8217;s hours of operation</a> in retaliation is inexcusable. Not only was Mark Udall unable yesterday to address <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_co_udall_health_care.html">pine beetle problems in the West</a>, but Claire McCaskill was unable to conduct hearings on <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/mccaskill-rails-on-new-low-of-gop-obstruction-video.php">police contractors in Afghanistan</a>.</p>
<p>I suppose for all this we can thank John McCain: <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/88285-mccain-dont-expect-gop-cooperation-the-rest-of-this-year">&#8220;There will be no cooperation for the rest of the year.&#8221;</a> It doesn&#8217;t matter to the GOP that pine beetles and Afghan police contractors are each pretty serious issues in their respective regions, nor that they have absolutely nothing to do with health care. Classy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/03/24/pissy-gop-cuts-senate-business-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Democrats Need to Show Some Leadership</title>
		<link>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/02/03/colorado-democrats-need-to-show-some-leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/02/03/colorado-democrats-need-to-show-some-leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Plavnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betsy Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Perlmutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coloradoprogressive.com/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats are disheartened now, and with good reason. Any time a Democratic president has to remind a Democratic majority that they are indeed the majority, things can&#8217;t be going well.
And back home in Colorado, our elected officials are playing safe on the topic of health care reform, all except for Jared Polis, who, alongside a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are disheartened now, and with good reason. Any time a Democratic president has to <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/obama-to-dems-gop-doesnt-have-a-41-59-majority.php?ref=fpa">remind</a> a Democratic majority that they are indeed the majority, things can&#8217;t be going well.</p>
<p>And back home in Colorado, our elected officials are playing safe on the topic of health care reform, all except for Jared Polis, who, alongside a splinter faction of liberal Democrats, sees <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/pelosi-no-hope-for-public-option-at-this-time.php">an opportunity to bring back the public option</a>. Hey, at least he&#8217;s showing some spine.</p>
<p>Betsy Markey doesn&#8217;t answer to me, since I vote in Denver County, but she&#8217;s hunkered down with the Blue Dogs in an effort to smash apart the existing House health care bill and pass smaller, more &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; pieces. No surprise there, really, since <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/08/betsy-markey-shuns-party-_n_350017.html">Markey voted against the bill</a> in the first place.</p>
<p>Diana DeGette, however, does answer to my vote, and I&#8217;m frankly stunned to read this in <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14321404">today&#8217;s Denver Post</a>: &#8220;Rep. Diana DeGette of Denver said she&#8217;s willing to start negotiating the bill again from scratch if Republicans show a good-faith willingness to engage in the process.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a head scratcher, frankly. As the elder stateswoman of Colorado politics, DeGette ought to know better by now than to kowtow to the appearance of a bipartisanship that has left the building. Even to make statements that validate the notion of bipartisanship coming from <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2009/12/judd-greggs-blueprint-for-gop-obstruction.php?page=1">obstructionist Republicans</a> is to feed the false premise that Republicans <em>want</em> to solve any of these issues. They don&#8217;t, because it&#8217;s clearly in their better interests to let Dems wallow in the morass they&#8217;ve made for themselves out of all these elitist ideas about social change. In fact, the only thing that could make the GOP any happier right now <em>is to do it all over again!</em></p>
<p>Ed Perlmutter is at least on track not to lose sight of what&#8217;s at stake, but as<a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14321404"> the Post points out</a>, Big Insurance makes it impossible to just pass what we like from the bill a piece at a time:</p>
<blockquote><p>Complicating that further, one of the most popular stand-alone elements — doing away with pre-existing-condition exclusions — is probably untenable to pass on its own. Insurance companies say they can cover pre-existing conditions only if the pool of healthy Americans buying insurance also expands significantly, as it would only do under the comprehensive bills.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right. Well, so much for pushing through even popular legislation. Don&#8217;t worry, though. John Salazar is <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">still working for health care reform for his constituents</span> out there somewhere: &#8220;U.S. Rep. John Salazar of Manassa, the final Democrat in the delegation, declined to be interviewed for this story.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for our senators, the Post has Bennet in a pinch:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s impossible to pick it right now,&#8221; said Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., when quizzed on which of the ways forward now being discussed he preferred.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, sure. Need we remind Senator Bennet that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/22/michael-bennet-ill-lose-m_n_366780.html">the Internet never forgets</a>?  The freshman needs to show a little gumption and at least let us know how he plans to advance the health care reform agenda. He might as well come out fighting for it, because <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/politics/ci_14322639">the president plans to campaign for Bennet</a> and <a href="http://www.rockymountainright.com/?q=node/1170">the right will hang the liberal Obama agenda around Bennet&#8217;s neck and watch him flounder</a>.  So he might as well <em>do something</em> and earn progressive votes where he can.</p>
<p>Mark Udall has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen.-mark-udall/the-right-thing-to-do_b_448007.html">raised the clarion call on DADT repeal</a>, asking not only for an inquiry but a roadmap to resolution&#8211;and soon&#8211;and he deserves praise for that. But Udall needs to step up as a leader on murkier issues that <em>will matter to even more people.</em> Colorado runs something like <a href="http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2008/10/06/daily33.html">18% uninsured</a>, and in Denver it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_13390275">pushing 23%</a>. With that many lives imperiled by the status quo, it&#8217;s not enough to answer a question with a question, <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14321404">even when couched in a beloved football metaphor</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.joncaldara.com/2009/06/25/save-my-minions-health-insurance/">Democrats are getting reamed on the issue of a mandate</a>, which they sort of deserve if they can&#8217;t come up with a viable nonprofit health insurance option to compete with big insurance. We need ideas and action, dammit, and legislators who aren&#8217;t afraid to do their jobs while they have them. And if Democratic lawmakers do play possum on real, important issues, they&#8217;re not just going to appear vulnerable to Republican challengers, they&#8217;re going to alienate progressives, the very voters who might keep them in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coloradoprogressive.com/2010/02/03/colorado-democrats-need-to-show-some-leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
